brokruto.blogg.se

Fallout new vegas vs fallout 3 graphics
Fallout new vegas vs fallout 3 graphics











fallout new vegas vs fallout 3 graphics

Lost it when I came near Helios One and told NCR trooper that I was hungry and thought it was a food factory.

fallout new vegas vs fallout 3 graphics

Absolutely god damn brilliant in New Vegas. It's about subtle jokes hidden in dialogue directed at things you really shouldn't make fun of.ĭialogue writing.

fallout new vegas vs fallout 3 graphics

Dark humor is not about pinnning an old lady's head on the wall and laughing about it. As you travel further and ask around, you realize that there is more to your package than meets the eye.Īnd Bethesda genuinely misunderstood what dark humor stands for. Luckily you are found by one of the securitrons and healed by Doc Mitchell. In process, you are shot by one of the chairmen bosses with a weak handgun, and your package is taken from you. In New Vegas you start off as a courier, hired to carry a mysterious package to the NV Strip. No need to mention that the said team can't hold back an invasion of cockroaches, or the fact that entire vault contains a single 10mm handgun. In Fallout 3 you start out as a Vault Dweller that kills his entire Vault Security team while wearing pajamas. Anchorage got pretty dull about halfway through. The Pitt in particular felt too limited to be called a full expansion, and Op. FO3's DLCs (except for Point Lookout, which was actually great) felt like quests, not addons. Lonesome Road rounded off the sideline story which had been developing with an ending that was also excellent writing, giving an epic conclusion to an already amazing game. Old World Blues is fantastically written and very fun to explore. Honest Hearts, admittedly was a bit dull, but had great characters, great lore and beatiful landscapes.

fallout new vegas vs fallout 3 graphics

It also features a break in the usual gameplay. Dead Money was challenging and gave the game an horror feel. Point Lookout was great, and Broken Steel was a nice game extender, but they don't compare to NV's DLC. NV sticks to the lore perfectly, giving existing plans full coverage of the originals, and remaining true to the existing timeline.Īlso, minor note. What is explained in game is done so shortly and only just. One of my biggest issues was how FO3 stumped all over the lore. FO3 is set in a bland, dime-a-dozen urban hellhole ripped out of any Hollywood movie. FO1/2/NV are set in a more civilised, unique desert wasteland with existing factions. I will admit, the scary parts of the game gave it an edge, but they were few and far between. A typical post-apocalyptic setting with a few FO1/2 aspects thrown in to give it the title. I still think that New Vegas is a masterpiece of a game, especially when you put it besides its predessessor.įallout 3 was too.













Fallout new vegas vs fallout 3 graphics